socialjusticeprincesses:

vegetableighs:

African American unarmed teenager shot by police. *silence*

Rich, white, old cis male kills himself. *mourning and social awareness*

Fuck you for posting this. And fuck Tumblr for recommending this post to me.

Yeah, like there was any kind of silence after Mike Brown’s…

nevver:

Science!

wilhelmeberhardgodsweyn:

hi-its-meee:

trillslut:

I’m so glad I’m circumcised. My dick still works perfectly plus I don’t have to answer stupid questions from ignorant women. Why would I want foreskin now? Fuck that

Hey, it’s possible to be happy without foreskin AND not talk…

Most men know very little about what having either an intact or a circumcised penis is like, based on which one they don’t have.

colorsofsocialjustice:

shiftycheesecake:

antifeministphoenix:

dediscordia:

In my area, a female teacher was just caught having a (legally rape) sexual relationship with one of her male high school students.
The victim is in distress because he insists it was what he wanted.

All the dudes are laughing about this and saying…

FUCK NO
DO YOU KNOW WHAT FEMINISM IS?
I have never in my entire life met a feminist (myself included) that thinks that women shouldn’t be equal under the law as men. Because that’s the point isn’t it? Feminism has become a movement of equality for all peoples.
Yes, the media portrayal of feminism would so this, as well as some people, but they are not true feminists.
PLEASE before you say stuff like that, think about what you are saying. Saying those things just perpetuates social norms that we need to break.
Along with the original stated topic about the boy being raped, let’s break awful social norms to create a better future for us all!

Oh look, it’s the "you don’t know what feminism is" and "I never seen it, so it doesn’t exist" excuse. Not like I haven’t seen almost every Tumblr feminist say this like a parrot. Do you know? Here, let me help you. 

Men want protection against false rape allegations. They feel that a man’s life should not be ruined simply on the allegation of a woman who may be a vindictive liar. Currently, a woman can accuse a man of rape for no reason, and the man’s name is splashed in the paper and his life is ruined. So, they fought for laws granting men anonymity until charged with the crime of rape—not convicted, just charged.

Feminists fought against this, causing it to fail. Also see here, the London Feminist Network campaigning to defeat the proposal.

Men want an end to the justice system favoring women simply because they are women, and giving men harsher sentences simply because they are men.

Feminists fought against this, arguing that no woman should be sent to jail, even women who had murdered multiple people.

Men want equal treatment when victims of domestic violence, and to not be arrested for the crime of “being male” under primary aggressor policies.

Feminists fought against this by trying to suppress evidence showing that half of domestic violence is done by women, by threatening the researchers with bomb threats, death threats, etc. Modern, younger feminists are doing it as well.

The feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrest and prosecution philosophies, resulting primarily in having only male batterers criminally pursued.

Men want female rapists to be arrested, charged, and convicted with rape. In Western countries, women are rarely punished when raping men, due to the biased legal system. In some countries, women cannot be punished when raping men, since rape is defined as a male-perpetrated crime.

Feminists fought against this in India, arguing that “there is a physicality [in] rape” and that it would make things “more complicated for judges.”

Feminists fought against this in Israel, claiming that changing the law would result in men filing false rape claims.

So op is basically saying that because underage boys don’t understand how statutory rape is a problem, that this therefore justifies lax sentences received by female rapists? That’s real smart. Let’s all blame social problem on what teenagers have to say about them!

mmmmbeefy96:

pon-raul:

drugsound:

bitchussy:

r-xn:

Thank G-d there are people like Marco Rubio, who actually speak the truth with regard to the Israel/Palestine Conflict. 

The idea that Israel is responsible for war crimes has got to be a JOKE- especially coming from those who use their own innocent people as human shields in order to gain public attention around the world, and anyone else who supports their inhumane, loathsome and shameless war approach (not to mention their new PR tactic- using graphic images from Syria and Iraq to illustrate “suffering in Gaza by the hands of Israel”).

uh

Oh, I forgot.

I forgot that if you tell a country you are going to bomb them ahead of time, that makes it okay.

And then if they stay because it is THEIR HOMES where they made THEIR MEMORIES and THEIR LIVES… then THEY must be wrong. They must be human shields for not listening to your threats of violence.

Since they didn’t walk away from YOUR bombs, it’s THEIR fault.

Flawless logic.

^

They were bombing actual terrorists whose sole intent is to wipe the Jews off the map. And if Hamas were not using civilian centers to hide their military operations then we wouldn’t run into the people having to evacuate their homes now would we. 

I don’t think the accusation in the photoset is reasonable. If HAMAS was purposefully preventing those message from being sent, or somehow preventing the peaceful residents from leaving their homes, THEN they could be considered as using human shields. But as this story goes, they were solely encouraging them to be martyrs.

(via bacon-and-liberty-for-all)

4gifs:

Litter vigilante. [video]

Saw this video yesterday and I think she was being too vindictive with her actions. If she simply threw the trash back into the cars, thereby mimicking the drivers’ littering, this would have illustrated why littering is wrong. But she purposefully spilled the contents of the trash into the offenders’ cars, which is a too harsh response, and thereby took attention away from the original act of littering.

4gifs:

Litter vigilante. [video]

Saw this video yesterday and I think she was being too vindictive with her actions. If she simply threw the trash back into the cars, thereby mimicking the drivers’ littering, this would have illustrated why littering is wrong. But she purposefully spilled the contents of the trash into the offenders’ cars, which is a too harsh response, and thereby took attention away from the original act of littering.

(Source: ForGIFs.com, via bacon-and-liberty-for-all)

Tags: littering

proudly-pro-choice:

tktheswaggest:

tktheswaggest:

nevermindtheb0ll0cks:

if you don’t have a uterus, you’re opinion on abortions doesn’t count.

So if I have sex with a woman, I don’t wear a condom, I impregnate her, I don’t have a choice? I’m still responsible and I have just as much say in the decisions as she does,…

Then why should I be the one to pay child support if I told them I don’t want the baby?

I don’t think you should. I think everyone should be able to choose parenthood. If you want to opt out of parenthood, you should be able to sign your rights away - that, however, means you don’t get those rights, ever. You don’t get to walk in and out of that child’s life when it’s convenient.

- Emily.

(Source: feministfacts)

I guess feminism is the radical notion that women are people, but men are inanimate objects/animals.

Oh, and in case any of you need to have it explained why comparing men to M&Ms or puppies is not only dehumanizing, but also also completely unhelpful, here’s the thing. And that thing is called individuality. It means that individual humans are distinct and completely separate from one another, with their own consciousness, experiences, identity, reputation, and discernible personal characteristics. This is unlike M&Ms, which are anonymous, indistinguishable, and have absolutely no cognitive capacity whatsoever. And unlike dogs and other animals that can be conditioned for desired behavior, people are afforded the right to live within a system of rules & laws that inform their actions, with specific individual punishments reserved for specific transgressions.

A little bit of duplicity in the #notallmen tag.